For Craft CMS sites
SEO for Craft CMS Without Pretending the Platform Can Do What It Cannot
Search work on a Craft site is sections, entries, and URLs. An entry is indexed when it is a page someone should land on. The rest canonical to the section. Softix does not promise a ranking.
- sections, entries, and URLs, named specifically
- Limits of the platform said in the audit
- No plugin or app added without saying what it changes
- Index and pages on the report, not a ranking promise
Search engine blueprint
How search work is done on Craft CMS
The usual leak is entries that duplicate a section index, and fields that never render. The work stays inside the sections you already model. An entry is indexed when it is a page someone should land on. The rest canonical to the section.
Name the URLs that should be the answer
We list the pages that match real demand: sections, entries, and URLs. A URL that is only a filter, a tag, or a copy does not stay in that list.
Say what Craft CMS will let us change
An entry is indexed when it is a page someone should land on. The rest canonical to the section. If the platform blocks the fix, the audit says the limit instead of implying a setting that does not exist.
Clean what competes
The leak we start from is entries that duplicate a section index, and fields that never render. Duplicates are canonicalized, noindexed, or redirected. The choice is written down with the URL.
Report the index, not a promise
The monthly note is which URLs are indexed, which were consolidated, and which pages now match a query. We will not promise a ranking or revenue.
Where Craft CMS sites usually leak
The problems teams describe before they hire search help
The platform is the sections you already model. The leak is entries that duplicate a section index, and fields that never render.
Defaults are still on: archives, filters, or app pages no one meant to rank.
Each one is kept, canonicalized, or removed, with the URL in the fix list.
The homepage and an inner page fight for the same query.
One URL is the answer. The other links to it.
A plugin, app, or module was added to “do SEO.”
We name what it changes. If it only adds a meta tag, it is not the fix.
Content was written for a keyword the catalog or the CMS does not have.
Pages match sections, entries, and URLs that exist. We do not invent a collection.
The team was told the platform guarantees rankings.
It does not. Softix will not say that either.
| Channel | Plugin or app only | Work on the URLs |
|---|---|---|
| What changes | A settings screen | sections, entries, and URLs |
| What you can see | A score inside the app | URLs indexed, consolidated, or left alone |
| What it cannot do | Override the platform | Pretend Craft CMS has a control it does not |
| What we will not say | Guaranteed rankings | Guaranteed rankings |
What the engagement covers
Technical tactics for SEO for Craft CMS
Six pieces of work on a Craft site. An entry is indexed when it is a page someone should land on. The rest canonical to the section.
URL map
The pages that should answer a query are listed against sections, entries, and URLs.
Only real locations
A map pin exists if the business has a place. A platform site with no stores does not get city pages.
Claims the owner will sign
Copy states what the page is. Softix does not invent reviews, awards, or a ranking.
Index the URLs that matter
The leak we clean is entries that duplicate a section index, and fields that never render.
Mentions you can explain
Earned links only. A plugin does not create them. Paid networks are not part of the work.
From the query to the page
The monthly note is indexed URLs and the pages that match a query. Revenue and rankings are not promised.
One engagement, with the limit in writing
Index results a Craft CMS site can audit
What a platform engagement looks like
This is a representative description of the work on a Craft site, not a promise and not a traffic number we will invent. The leak was entries that duplicate a section index, and fields that never render. The constraint was the sections you already model.
An entry is indexed when it is a page someone should land on. The rest canonical to the section. Every fix named a URL. The report did not include a ranking guarantee. Where Craft CMS could not do the change, the note said so.
A different theme, catalog, or release will change the list. We will not promise a ranking or revenue.
What Softix will put in writing
- A written audit of URLs before a retainer starts
- A technical fix list in the first 30 days, with owners and URLs
- Monthly reporting on what was indexed, consolidated, or left alone
- No ranking guarantee, and no claim that the platform can do what it blocks
What teams usually ask before they sign
SEO for Craft CMS, in plain language
How long before SEO for Craft CMS shows up in the index?
Duplicate and default URLs can be cleaned within weeks. New pages that match sections, entries, and URLs more often take a few months before they are the URL Google keeps. The report names URLs. It does not promise a position.
Will an SEO plugin fix the site?
A plugin can edit a title. It does not decide which of sections, entries, and URLs should exist. That is the work.
What if Craft CMS cannot do the change?
An entry is indexed when it is a page someone should land on. The rest canonical to the section. The audit says the limit. We do not hide it.
Do you add city pages?
Only if there is a real place. A store or an office that does not exist does not get a page.
Will you promise rankings?
No. The platform does not guarantee them, and neither do we.
First look, before a retainer